Making one-of-a-kind pipes is not like designing repeatable shapes, where the design time is spread over many iterations and paid back piecemeal. With a one-of-a-kind, the design cost is a direct part of the total cost, and sometimes it can be a large chunk of the total creation time. I thought it might be interesting to write a post chronicling my entire experience of designing the latest Halloween pipe, from the initial commitment to the project to the final creation.
I started off with some very general sketches of a wide variety of subjects, but kept coming back to this sort of bowl shape. I fiddled around with this idea and produced the sketch at left, which was ok but not really what I wanted - It was much more Goblin than Talbert Halloween, at least as I wanted this year's run to be, and ultimately it became a new Goblin after various tweaks and changes. My problem with it was that it looked too overt and horror movie-ish, and my aim this year has been to make a set of Halloween pipes that were both surreal AND intense without resorting to the obvious prior tropes of claws, teeth, etc. So, while I liked this look, it got rejected, and I moved on to other ideas...
There followed a period of creative frustration as I sketched out idea after idea, playing with all sorts of curves and organic shapes as I searched for something that looked "right"... when I wasn't sure even what I wanted, just that I'd know it when I saw it. None of the above were "it", though I like a couple of them, particularly the lower right design, above, a weird combination of slug and scorpion.
I started thinking about layouts that were further from the traditional pipe design, and sketched out the pipe to the left, above. It's a cool looking thing though it would have some basic problems, like weight distribution and leakage around the stem from condensate flowing down... Still, an intriguing idea I may revisit someday. But it wasn't until I did the quick sketch of a Cavalier-style pipe, above right, that I suddenly said, "Yes, that's it."
This is a classic case of one of the main Pipemaker Problems - The imagination gets ahead of the function. I love the above designs, but they have all kinds of issues. The excessively long pointy bits would be fragile as hell, and prone to breakage. The airhole couldn't connect from mortise to bowl. The very curves that I liked played hell with the drilling angles internally. I did, however, really love the "Mad Scientist" feel of the design, and kept at it.
...BUT, not to the exclusion of other ideas. It's important not to get too fixated on one concept, especially one loaded with problems to surmount, so I sketched some other, similar themes as well:
The pipe on the right was a nice, straightforward expansion chamber design, but too simple, I thought, for a Halloween pipe - This was something for a regular Talbert Pipes stamp, perhaps a Signature piece but not a Halloween pipe. The one on the left, by contrast, looked plenty "Mad Scientist" but had drilling issues of its own, plus the potential hell of having to make a handcut churchwarden stem. 99% of all churchwarden stems you see on the market are molded, and here's why - Making a handcut churchwarden stem from rod stock is nastily expensive, for one, as it will take up the material of at least three normal stems. It's also hard-to-impossible to drill depending on length, because most lathe beds used by small shops aren't long enough to accommodate a long rod section and the extended length drill bit needed to drill the airhole. All that unsupported length wants to flop when spun and I don't have a lathe support for long stock. Then you have to shape and file the damn thing, which is 3X the work of any normal length stem plus the additional hell of making sure the full length is perfectly smooth linearly and not ripply or fluctuating in thickness. It's a major pain.
The problem was, my preferred idea was rife with issues too. The proportions of the design were going to require a HUGE briar block (seen in the faint outline) to allow the shape, and even with an extra-large block, the eventual pipe would seem a bit small - The two deciding factors were the top-to-tip distance from bowl rim to bottom point, and the point-to-point length of the shank section. That's a lot of briar. Ultimately unsatisfied with the shorter bowl heights possible, I looked into making it a component pipe of many pieces. In the sketch above, you can see some of my notes where I debated making the bowl-only from briar, and then fitting it via some sort of joiner to a shank section made from briar or meerschaum. I kept turning over material combinations and it kept getting more and more ridiculously complex, but none of the ideas I had got me around the fundamental problem of the layout, which was the expansion chamber. Since the bowl airhole and stem couldn't directly connect, it would need to be an expansion chamber design, which meant a large open shank section... completely at odds with the design's thin and delicate shank. The inward curvature of the shank meant a long, narrow expansion area and hard limits on how much "recurve" I could give the profile lines.
Frustrated again, I rethought.
The above-right sketch came first. What if the shank were compressed? That is, use the much-obsessed-over design but "squish" the shank inward, making it fatter instead of long and fragile. I liked the first sketch but it needed refinement, which it got in the above-left drawing. When I looked at that, I knew it was "it" - Something that looked appropriately "Mad Scientist-Insane" without resorting to fangs and skulls, yet was also a solidly practical layout with a large shank for the expansion chamber, good weight distribution, and compact proportions that would let me get a large bowl out of a single block of briar, making the thing all of one block.
I had a couple of minor changes - The stem was too large for any available rod stock diameter, and furthermore not even workable due to the curves I wanted in the shank section. I ditched the idea of a shank ring on grounds that the strength of the design was in the profile, and too many extraneous details would overcomplicate it fast. That led to the working layout below.
And that's how I got to this!
Saturday, October 12, 2013
Here's a little pop psychology help - Some thoughts on motivation and mood, if you will. It's October here, and that means it's time to make Talbert Halloween Pipes. This is a high stress, high concentration task that requires a lot of focus and confidence and a good clear pipeline to the creative part of the brain. I've done creative work for long enough that I can usually slip fairly easily into "the mode" when required, but something unusual happened this time around and I thought I'd write down just how I dealt with it in the context of being a working creative professional, in case it might be of help to others.
In a nutshell, my philosophy can be summed up as, "Make a billiard."
The reason I 'm writing this is because at the start of this month, we had to have our 19 year old cat Loki put down. Loki has been with Emily and myself for nearly our entire married life; she was one of the family. Lately her age had really been hitting her hard and a number of health issues were manifesting in faster and faster succession. Finally, right at the start of October, Loki had what could only be described as a Very Bad Morning and the decision had to be made.
Em and I were both pretty upset by the whole experience, as you can probably imagine. Having to hold and console your near-20 year companion as the vet gives her the lethal injection is not a life event I would wish on others. So we came home and sat around despondent for a couple of days. However, we're self-employed, and when we're not working, we're falling behind - No guaranteed paychecks here, so one has to develop emotional coping mechanisms to handle these sorts of bumps in life. Because frankly, when I'm really down about something, the last thing I feel like doing is going out into the workshop and pouring lots of creativity into an enjoyable project. It's a Catch-22 - I do my best work when I'm enthused and feeling creative, yet I have to work to keep the grocery bills paid.
The result is my simple fall-back rule - Make a billiard (and yes, I know the pipe pictured above is not a proper billiard... Away with you, pedants!). I'm a big believer in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, which is a fancy way of saying that if you're depressed, go do something positive and before long, you'll change your own mood. Stewing doesn't help, sulking doesn't help, brooding doesn't help - For me, the answer has always been, do something. While I might not be in the right frame of mind to sit down and produce some sort of artistic creation, what I can do is follow rules and do technical work.
Billiards don't require creativity.
Billiards have set parameters. They don't need emotion poured into them.
A billiard is a guarantee, like a promise of morning - Follow the rules, make the shape, and if you get the technical stuff right you'll have a good looking pipe.
And the magical thing is what follows, which is - I sit back, I look at it, and I have concrete proof right there in hand that I've made something. Instead of sitting and feeling sad and unmotivated, I've produced something positive that's going to make someone, somewhere, happy. Call it an affirmation of life, if you will - The root premise of Cognitive Therapy is that even if you're not feeling it, you do positive things and your brain will eventually pick up on these constructive routines of thinking and slip back into a more positive outlook. I make, therefore I am happy. (I'm a pretty simple guy, really)
So, that's what I have to offer to readers - If you're feeling down, make something. Do something constructive. Don't just sit, go mow your neighbor's lawn or organize your attic or repaint your kitchen. In short, don't stew, do.
Make a billiard.